Voting Security Rights
Enforcement Powers
Laws without the power of enforcement offer no accountability for enforcement, are political in nature and are without merit. Our government and citizens must be coequal in the creation, enforcement, and settlement of Voting Security and Election law disputes. All citizens must be enabled to aid in the legal implementation, practice, and enforcement of the laws. To this end, our research and advocacy focus on the following voting security measures to preserve and advance the interests of every citizen who votes. State and Local Election Management Offices are responsible and held accountable for executing voting security and election laws as enacted by the State and Local legislative bodies. State law provides legal Standing in courts for citizens, law enforcement, and Legislators to hold Individuals, the Election Management Office, EMO Officers, and EMO Agents accountable for election crimes, and misdemeanors they commit or enabled by failing to implement, execute and comply with the voting security and election laws as enacted by the legislature and upheld by the courts. If two or more voter in a precinct thinks there’s a problem with an election, those voters can file a petition with the local election board, and until the issue is legally resolved, the election board cannot certify the election. Legislative bodies, Citizens, Local Police Departments, County Shariff Departments, and State Police Departments are empowered to investigate possible violations of Voting Security crimes and to bring charges against individuals, Election Management Officers, and Election Management Agents, so long as such investigation does not interfere with a registered voter's legal ability to cast a legal vote. Court changes to voting security and election laws via judicial decision require approval of the state legislature to be in force. One or more illegal votes cast in an election are grounds for voter disenfranchisement for both a single citizen who voted legally, as well as the class of all citizens who legally voted in the election that the voting security violation occurred. Voter disenfranchisement is a cause for awards related to damages and harm retribution in a Civil court no less than the value of the previous six years of Federal, State, and local taxation the harmed party has paid. Disenfranchised citizens have legal standing to bring Civil charges against the Election Management Office when voting security and election laws are broken by its agents or the breaking of voting security and election laws are enabled due to dereliction of duty in the Election Management Office's execution of the voting security and election laws as enacted by the legislature. When criminals violate voting security laws the court is empowered by the legislature to impose severe penalties. Every member of the Election office and every citizen of the state can object to additions or removals to the State Voter Registration List on legal grounds and seek legal remediation when the Election Management Officers are unable to agree on the proper handling of disputed voter registration list changes. Courts are obligated to remediate VRL-related disputes in hast and to resolve VRL-related disputes before election day in accordance with the law as defined by the legislature.
Voting Security Rights Navigation
Election Transparency - Balanced Election Management Body - Enforcement Power - Ballot Handling Security - Voting Request Authenticity
Ballot Access Authorization - Ballot Casting Security - Secure The Count - Voting Confidentiality