Partisan-balanced election management is critical to preventing perversion in implementing and enforcing our voting security and election laws. Granting one-party partisan control of election policies, procedures, and measures invites the risk of one-party rule. It is an opening for the interest of a single party to override the will of the citizens who vote in an election. Every risk of an exploited vulnerability and an election’s results not representing the will of the citizens who voted must be mitigated and eliminated. This starts with the office and officers responsible for lawfully executing election policies and voting security measures. State and Local governments must establish a Partisan-Balanced (EMO) Election Management Office to execute, enforce, investigate, and ensure all voting security and election laws are carried out as the legislature prescribes. The Election Management Office is led by a board of officers comprised of three members selected by popular vote and one member from each party that each party selects as they see fit. Candidates on the ballot are not allowed to serve in Election Management positions. Election Management Officials' terms should be no more than four years, Starting in January of odd-numbered years. Election Management Officials' service shall be limited to two non-consecutive terms, and swearing in new election officials should be staggered for each partisan pair, with a new swearing-in every two years and both replaced within six years. The Election Management Office and Officers are legally bound to the successful execution of their duty to uphold voting security and election laws as defined by the legislature. Election Management Officials swear an oath to uphold the people's will by faithfully executing voting security and election laws as defined by the legislature. State and Local partisan-balanced Election Management Offices are responsible and held accountable for executing voting security and election laws as enacted by the State and Local legislative bodies. As local communities are gathered by a common bond unique to their local governments and unique to their community’s location, it is important communities are not divided by partisan politics and outside competing influences. The will of the people of a community must be represented in the collective vote of the community. To this end, the legislature should empower the partisan-balanced Election Management Office to control election districting and restrict such districting powers to preserve the unity of local communities. The partisan-balanced Election Management Office defines election districts with the following restrictions in their districting duty. All cities and towns in a defined district should be from the same county. Election districting is restricted from dividing a town of fewer than 25,000 eligible voters into separate districts. Large metropolitan districts must be contained within the city boundaries and not cross the city border into surrounding cities and towns. For larger towns and cities divided into multiple districts, the borders of such districts must be restricted to the city or town border and no more than a combination of 10 straight lines within the interior of the city or town. In this way, the unity of our closest related local communities and their collective common bonds are represented in our elections, and their will is acknowledged. Finally, it is critical for the proper execution of voting security and election laws that private funding of election offices and officials is prohibited.